Came across this article in Io9 recently, then again over at Scoop.it. You can tell something is important not only when it speaks to you, but when like-minded individuals begin referencing it! And if you own a blog, you definitely want to get on that! In any case, I found the list especially interesting for two reasons. One, many of the books I have already read. And two, I haven’t even heard of the rest.
I’d say a list like this is long overdue, but it’s still highly subjective isn’t it? The books we pretend we’ve read all comes down to what we consider important and relevant, not to mention popular. And even within the genre of sci-fi, I’d say that list is too big to boil down to a simple top ten. Even so, it’s interesting to read and compare, and find out just how many you’ve read yourself. So please, check this out and tell me which of these you have read and which you think you’ll want to check out:
1. Cryptonomicon:
Read it! This book is Neal Stephenson’s groundbreaking piece of historical fiction, combining narratives involving World War II cryptographers with modern day IT geeks who are looking to establish a data haven in the South Pacific. The story tells the tale of a massive shipment of Nazi gold that got lost on its way to Japan, ran aground in the Philippines, and remained hidden until the late 90’s.
Personally, I loved this book because of the way it weaves history, both recent and distant, into a seamless narrative and draws all the characters into the same overarching plot. One would think that Stephenson was making a point about how we are all subjects of our shared history, but it could just be he’s that good a writer!
2. Dune:
Read it thrice! In Dune, Frank Herbert draws upon an immense store of classical sci-fi themes, a grand awareness of human nature and history, and a keen grasp of ecology and the influence environment has on shaping its inhabitants to create the classic that forever established him as one of the greatest sci-fi minds of all time.
Sci-fi geeks everywhere know this one and it saddens to me to think that it’s even on this list. Anyone who’s willing to pretend that they read this book clearly considers it important, which is why they should have read it, dammit! Not only is it a classic, it’s from the guy who literally wrote the book on science fiction that was meant to be taken seriously.
3. Gravity Rainbow:
Never heard of it! Apparently, the story came out in 1974 and deals with the German V2 rocket program near the end of World War II. Pat Murphy, author of The City, Not Long After and The Wild Girls, went so far as to compare this book to James Joyce, a the great Irish modernist writer who was also renowned for being brilliant and inaccessible.
In addition to be classified as enriching, it is known for being odd and hard to get through, with many authors themselves claiming to have started it several times but never being able to finish it. The plot is also rather unique, combining transgressive sexuality with the idea of total war and technological races. But one look at the dust jacket will tell you all of that, right? Crazy Germans!
4. Foundation:
Read it myself, and also am somewhat sad that it made the list. Sure, the fact that it’s a classic means that just about everyone who’s eve shown the slightest interest in sci-fi would want to read it. But I can’t for the life of me understand why people would claim to have read it. Jesus, it’s not a hard read, people. And Amazon sells used copies for cheap and handles shipping. No excuses!
And having just reviewed it, I shall say nothing of the plot, except that it in many ways inspired fellow great Frank Herbert in his creation of Dune. Like Frank, Asimov combined the idea of a Galactic Empire with a keen awareness of human history, eternal recurrence, and prescient awareness.
5. Johnathon Strange & Mr. Norrell:
Now this one I have heard of, but never felt compelled to pick up and read. Apparently, its size and bulk are the reason many people react the same. This 2004 book is the first novel by British writer Susanna Clarke which deals with the nature of the English character and the boundary between reason and irrationality.
Set in 19th-century England during the time of the Napoleonic Wars, the story is an alternative history that is based on the idea that at one time, magic existed in England and has thanks to the help of two men – the namesakes of the story, Jonathan Strange and Gilbert Norrell. At once interesting and speculative, it also presents the rather romantic vision of romance returning to a world increasingly characterized by modernity and cold reason.
6. 1984:
Yep, read this one thrice as well! And given it’s reputation and place in the annals of literary history, I can totally see why people pretend to have read it. Oh, and let’s not forget the way people love to reference and abuse it’s message for the sake of making a quick and easy political point! But none of that excuses not reading it.
Set in an alternate history where WWIII and revolution have led to totalitarian governments in every corner of the world, the story tells the tale of one man’s quest to find answers and facts in a world permeated by lies and absolute repression. Of course, this meager description doesn’t do it justice. In the end, so much comes into play that it would take pages and pages just to provide an adequate synopsis. Suffice it to say, it’s a book that will change your life. READ IT!
7. First and Last Men and Star Maker:
Another one which I’m not too sure about. Much of what is described within are concepts I have heard of in other places, and some of the content sounds familiar. Still, can’t say I’ve ever heard of Stapledon or these two works by name. But after reading about his work, I’m thinking I ought to check him out now. Tell me if you’d agree…
Published in 1930 and 1937, these two books tackled some rather broad ground. The first deals with the history of humanity, covering 18 species of humanity from the present to two billion years into the future. Based on Hegelian concept of history, humanity goes through several different types of civilizations and passes between stability and chaos over the course of it all. However, undeniable progress is made, as each civilization reaches further the last, culminating in leaps in evolution along the way.
In Star Maker, the plot revolves around a man who is able to leave his body and venture throughout the universe. He is able to merge with more minds along the way, a snowballing effect which allows him and his companions to explore more and worlds through time and space. This leads to a climax where a cosmological mind is created and makes contact with the “Star Maker” – the creator of the universe.
Sounds cool huh? And they appear to have no shortages of accolades. For example, Arthur C. Clarke called Star Maker one of the finest works of science fiction ever written, and the concept explored therein had a profound influence on many subsequent sci-fi minds, not the least of which were Gene Roddenberry and J.M. Straczynski.
8. The Long Tomorrow:
This one, I have heard of, mainly because it’s on my list as an example of post-apocalyptic fiction. I have yet to read it, but after reading about it, I think I would like to. Set in a post-apocalyptic world devastated by nuclear war, the story takes place within a society that is controlled by religious groups preaching a technophobic message.
Inevitably, the story comes to a head when young people, intrigued by stories of a neighboring community, go out in search of it, braving punishment and even exile. Sounds familiar? Well, it should. This book, which was published in 1955, has gone on to inspire countless variations and pop culture renditions. It also attempts to illustrate the connection between natural disasters and regression, traditionalism and repression.
9. Dhalgren:
Yet another book that’s compared to James Joyce, largely by people that haven’t read it. I’m one of them! Apparently, this 1975 story by Samuel R. Delany takes place in a fictitious Midwestern town that has become cut off from the outside world by an event horizon. All communications are cut off, and the population become frightened by the night sky reveals two moons, and the morning sun is many times larger than our own.
More strange is the fact that street signs and landmarks shift constantly, while buildings that have been burning for days are either never consumed or show signs of damage. Gangs also begin to roam the nighttime streets, their members hidden within holographic projections of gigantic insects or mythological creatures. Against this backdrop, a group of people come together and try to make sense of what has happened as they struggle to survive.
Told from the point of view of a partial amnesiac, dysmetric, schizophrenic, as well as a bunch of other people who find themselves stranded in the city, the story is an exercise is confusion, dissociation, and a really just a big mystery. In the end, what is truly going on is never revealed, thus leaving the reader with their own interpretations. This is one of the selling points of the book, with William Gibson himself saying that it was “A riddle that was never meant to be solved.” Yeah, I definitely need to read this one!
10. Infinite Jest:
This last novel is more recent, having been released in 1996. Once again, haven’t heard of it, but given its content, praise, and the fact that the author’s low life was cut tragically short, it doesn’t surprise me that its one of those books that everyone feels they must read. But given the length, complexity and the fact that story contains 388 numbered end notes, I can see why they’ve also held back!
The story focuses on the lives of a celebrity family known as the Incandezas, a clear pun on their, shall we say… luminous fame? The family is deeply involved in tennis, struggles with substance abuse, and in a state of disrepair since the father – a famous film director – committed suicide with a microwave. His last work was apparently a film (entitled “Infinite Jest”, but known throughout the story as “The Entertainment”) which is so entertaining, it causes viewer to lose all interest in everything besides watching the movie.
Clearly meant as a satire on North American culture, particularly celebrity families, entertainment, substance abuse and the sideshow that is celebrity rehab, the story is all about various people’s search for the missing tape of “The Entertainment” and what they plan to do with it. The novel received wide recognition and praise after its publication and became a testament to Wallace’s talent after he committed suicide in 2008.
Okay, that’s four out of ten for me. How did you do? And even if you could say that you’ve read most of the books on this list, or at least the one’s you’ve heard of, I’d say we’ve all come away with a more additions to our reading lists, hmmm? Yeah, I guess its back to Amazon for me!
Sad but true 😉
I saw this post yesterday and was as impressed by it as I was humbled at how unread I am. I’ve read 1984 and Foundation. I’ve tried to read Dune and well, hated it and never finished. As for the rest…Never heard of them.
I’ll definitely check some of them out.
As for pretending to have read books…eh…What’s the point? I’m not as well read as I would like to be, but that too is relative. Typically when we say “well read”, it seems we’re talking about certain types of literature as opposed to basic reading. By that standard I’m not well read. I can’t claim to have read a lot of the “big” names but reading? All the time. AND I’m always wanting to read something new or different. That is why I love your blog. You’re always giving me great ideas for my next book to read.
Yeah, I have my uses 😉
I can honestly say I’ve never read any of those books. And I’ve got a long reading list.
Not even Dune, Foundation, or 1984? Didn’t they make you read it in school???
I didn’t read any of these in school, myself. In fact most of my reading has occurred after the age of 30. Also, as my time is so spare, I do a lot of reading in the car via iPod. Thank God for technology.
no, they made us read wuthering heights, huck finn, and a few short stories by Phillip Roth. Oh, and the Illiad.
Oh the horror…
actually, i was in ap english classes my last 2 yrs of high school, now that i think about it. yeah, we covered the classics, but i think 1984 and gulliver’s travels were covered by the mainstream classes. plus i think they changed the curriculum for different books, depending on what they felt the students needed to be taught.
speaking of ‘the horror’ they made us read Heart of Darkness. I hated that book sooo much. But I’ve done Dune, Foundation, and 1984 off this list. And of these, I think, only Cryptonomicon sounds vaguely interesting.
I’ve read six of the ten, some of those more than once. Never heard of The Long Tomorrow, or at least don’t recall it. Why do people pretend to have read books, anyway? What’s the point?
To look smart. It is the same reason people yell about their political views when they don’t follow politics because they know that they should care and pretending to care makes one seem smarter than admitting they don’t.
They think it makes them sound smart, or well read. Or it helps them to make a point, like with 1984. Nobody wants to admit that they haven’t actually read the work they are citing.
Ouch, I did very poorly; having only read Dune and 1984. I’ve wanted to read Infinitte Jest for a long time; David Foster Wallace is widely considered to be the biggest American genius since Twain. And everytime I see Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, I think I would enjoy it. And I picked up my first Neal Stephenson book (not Cryptonomicon) a month or so ago, but I have no idea when I will find time to read it. Perhaps most disappointing to me is my lack of Asimov reading (and Clarke but he didn’t make the list). I read a few things when I was a kid; but dont even remember the titles anymore. I can’t even pretend to have read books that I actually read.
Reblogged this on Tying Molecular Knots and commented:
There are some great books on the list and I’ve only read a couple. And the one, Johnathon Strange & Mr. Norrell, only part of the way through. The concept I love, but for some reason, I kept drifting off to sleep every time I tried to read the book. This is not a failing of the book, just the reason I never finished the thing. If there is a chance I’ll make another attempt, I’ll keep the coffee on standby throughout.
I just looked up Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, and to me that’s fantasy, not science fiction. Magic has nothing to do with SF, and the inclusion of such books is one of the things that annoys me most about the slide to treating the two genres as more or less interchangable.
Yes, they do tend to do that, with many references to a book being that its SC/F. And don’t forget alternate histories, they too are lumped in there, but mainly because it can be argued that these are interpretations of the “Many Worlds” hypothesis.
Alternate history is just as entitled to be considered SF as future history, as long as it doesn’t include magic, elves, or zombies.
8 out of 10. Not bad, not bad.
First time I’ve ever heard of 1984 being described as “alternate history”.
Well, by our current standards, but you’re right, it was speculative when it was written
Of the list I’ve read Dun and tried to read Clark. Some I’ve heard of, some not.
I think the list is personal. Each person will have their must read list.