In 1989, two scientific researchers – Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons – announced the achievement of cold fusion. In a press release that garnered massive amounts of publicity, they stating that their experiment, involving a electrified palladium rod placed in a solution of heavy water, had succeeded in absorbing hydrogen and compressing it within the rod to the point that individual atoms began to fuse and helium was formed.
Naturally, other labs began to test their method and found that the same did not happen for them. With time, the experiment was revealed to be the result of a false positive as more and more labs claimed they unable to replicate the results. In the end, their announcement appeared premature and their claims unscientific. Still, the men never retracted their claim and moved their labs overseas.
And interestingly enough, the declaration that they had achieved the dream of clean, abundant, cheap energy fueled the public’s imagination. Henceforth, the concept of cold fusion, as they had preached it, was featured in numerous movies and stories, even though it was now believed to be something of a pipe dream. And for some, the idea of the technology never died. Cold fusion remained a scientific dream similar to a Grand Unifying Theory or the elusive Higgs Boson.
One such organization is NASA, who continues work on this science through the development of their low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) technology. It is their hope that one day the technology will be sophisticated enough to become commercially viable, making cold fusion reactors that could power everything – from homes, to cars, to planes – a reality.
And unlike previous attempts that sought to harness basic fusion, the technology behind the LENR is really quite revolutionary. Rather than rely on strong nuclear forces to meld atoms and produce energy, LENR harnesses the power of weak nuclear force.
This is done by using an oscillating nickel lattice that takes in hydrogen atoms and then exchanges electrons with them. This has the effect of forming slow-moving neutrons which are absorbed, making the nickel unstable. To regain its stability, the nickel strips a neutron of its electron so that it becomes a proton — a reaction that turns the nickel into copper and creates a lot of energy in the process.
The big upside to this process is the fact that it produces zero ionizing radiation and zero radioactive waste, making it the safest and cleanest nuclear process to date. In addition, NASA claims that relying on reactors like these, it would only take 1% of the world’s nickle production to meet the world’s current energy needs, and at a quarter of the cost of dirtier fuels like coal. On top of that, they’ve also indicated that the same process can be done using a carbon lattice instead of nickel, making it even more versatile.
So the question remains, why isn’t every household running on a LENR reactor already? Well, two problems. For one, the amount of energy needed to get the ball rolling is quite high. Initially, the LENR requires a 5-30THz frequency burst of energy to make the nickel lattice begin oscillating, which is difficult to efficiently produce.
Second, other labs have experienced a few… uh, accidents… trying to reproduce the process, which included a few explosions and some melted windows. No deaths were reported, mind you, but it does demonstrate that the process can generate a LOT of power if not properly controlled.
Still, other means of generating electricity, such as nuclear fission, have experienced some bumps along the way (i.e. Chernobyl and Three Mile Island) and we still rely on them. And oil and coal are what we’ve come to think of as “dirty means” of generating power, meaning they cause tremendous amounts of pollution or can lead to environmental debacles, such as oil spills. And natural gas can only last so long. So realistically, there may be hope for LENR and cold fusion yet.
Fingers so very crossed! And be sure to check out NASA’s video explaining the process:
Source: Extremetech.com
Is NASA, by any chance, working on overcoming the death barrier?
By that you mean solving mortality? I believe not.
i’ve gotten interest in that subject recently. Do you know anything about that?
Nope, haven’t heard a thing. As far as I know, all their work is concentrated on robotic exoskeletons, a moon base, a Mars rocket, rovers, satellites, and deep space probes. Nothing having to do with life extension or clinical immortality.
I was asking if you knew anything about life extension and clinical immortality, not what NASA’s studying these days.
Oh, well then yes. Though there are plenty of options available for the wanna be immortal. There’s the biomedical approach, the nanotechnological approach, and the cybernetic/AI approach. Which do you want to know more on, or should I just dump all the info I got?
Biomedical, please.
Well, let see… First, there’s the idea of gene therapy where we would have specially designed DNA strands introduced into our bodies that would counter-act the instructions our genes have that lead to the aging process. By overriding those instructions, we could remain alive almost indefinitely.
And then there’s gene splicing, where a person would have their genome engineered to include DNA from species that do not age or can live extremely long lives, like koi, jellyfish, and certain types of bacteria and trees. By replacing the genetic information that tells our bodies to age to continue reproducing and replacing dead cells, we could also live on four centuries or longer…
And then there’s just good old fashion stem cells, cloning and cryonics that essentially mean you can heal what you got, reproduce what you got, or freeze it periodically to accomplish big leaps in time and slow down the aging process.
Next? Or will that do it for ya?