The Future is Here: NASA’s Ion Drive!

Ion_thruster_nasaWell, it seems Star Trek might have gotten another one right. In addition to warp travel, computer pads, and the possibility of a real-life star ship Enterprise being built by 2030, it seems that ion engines that can propel ships on interplanetary missions are also possible. As a staple of many science fiction franchises, many have wondered whether or not the technology would ever be truly feasible.

For years, NASA has been experimenting with various ionic propulsion drives. But with this latest announcement, they’ve not only indicated success, but broke a world record. On Dec 28th, in one of the last news stories of the year, NASA announced that their Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) has operated continually for over 43,000 hours (just shy of five years). Since ion thrusters are believed to be one of the best ways to power long-term deep-space missions, this is a big step towards powering NASAโ€™s next-gen spacecraft.

Electrostatic_ion_thruster-en.svg_As the name suggests, ion thrusters work by firing ions (charged atoms or molecules) out of a nozzle at high speed. In the case of NEXT, Xenon (a noble gas) is squirted into a chamber where its molecules are charged via an electron gun, creating a plasma of negative and positive ions. The positive ions diffuse to the back of the chamber, where high-charged accelerator grids grabs them and propel them out of the engine, creating thrust.

The upside of such a thruster lies in its fuel efficiency, in that it uses 10-12 times less fuel than a regular chemical thruster. Unfortunately, the downside lies in the thrust, again relative to its chemical counterparts. Due to this, NASA scientists calculated that an ion engine needs to operate continuously for a minimum of 10,000 hours (roughly a year) to slowly accelerate a spacecraft to speeds necessary to reach the asteroid belt or beyond.

asteroidsWith this test, NASA proved that their new ion thruster would not only be able to propel a spaceship to the asteroid belt, but to the outer planets and their moons as well. That’s good news for people looking forward to visiting Ganymede, Europa, Titan, and maybe even the Kuiper Belt. What’s more, the maximum speed of the spacecraft would be in the region ofย  321,000 km/h (200,000 mph).

Back in 2011, NASA put out a request-for-proposals for a test mission that will likely use a NEXT engine. Presumably, following this successful engine test, we might be hearing more about this in the near future. And, now that the proof in the pudding, other space agencies are likely to unveil their own prototypes for ion engines, and even equipping the next generation of space craft with them.

Asteroid mining? Mars colonization? Off-world resource and manufacturing allocation? Looks like we got ourselves the means to get us there! Oh, and Star Trek nerds? Looks like you guys got your nacelles! Full impulse ahead!

asteroid_beltSource: Extremtech.com, NASA.org

9 thoughts on “The Future is Here: NASA’s Ion Drive!

  1. “Off-world resource and manufacturing allocation?” hahaha, off-shoring the earth’s business to other planets? what a possibility! inter-planetary direct investments, huh? ๐Ÿ˜‰ hello, there… ๐Ÿ™‚

    1. Well luckily there’s no local population to exploit, that we know of :P! The main selling point there is that we’d be polluting other planets, but since they have little atmosphere to speak of, not much danger of ruining the local environment.

      1. negative externality, huh? earthlings are too adept at polluting, we should look for other worlds we could pollute unlimited, lol ๐Ÿ˜‰ or, our planet will implode that is, after mutants have become common habitues, hahaha. oh, well, am talking shop… :c good day! ๐Ÿ™‚

  2. I wonder- since it uses Xenon, I can’t imagine this giving off much in the way of pollution, but admittedly I know very little on the real science of this fiction-come-true. What would your take on the toxic output be? And though I can probably assume the answer to this is ‘no’, given the current thrust speed to say the least, do you think this could ever be adapted for non-space travel uses? (In today’s fuel economy, one can’t help but hope for another option)

    1. Yes, I can see that now. “Come hunt bugs! And uh, if you can, could you bring one back? Bioweapons research will pay BIG BUCKS for one! Only problem is, you have to smuggle it back in your stomach…”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s